All about Constitutional Carry
Did you know that your right to carry a firearm could be under threat? For years, the government has placed restrictions on your ability to protect yourself and your loved ones, forcing you to jump through hoops and pay hefty fees just to exercise your Second Amendment rights. But there's a growing movement that's challenging these restrictions and fighting to give you back your right to carry without government interference. It's called Constitutional Carry, and in this post, we'll explore everything you need to know about this powerful movement and its potential impact on the world of firearms.
A huge trend that has swept through grassroots gun organizations is Constitutional carry. The gun community mobilized more than ever in 2012 after beating back a constant attack on our firearms rights. Coming out of that defense these organizations went on the offense. One of the offensive goals was the right to carry a firearm without having to ask permission, this is known as Constitutional carry.
Constitutional carry used to be known as Vermont carry. Vermont as a state never restricted the carry of firearms by any adult. It was ruled by the State Supreme court that the State’s constitution did not allow restrictions, including licensing schemes. Vermont had essentially been a Constitutional carry state since before the United State’s existed.
Defining Constitutional Carry
Constitutional Carry is by definition the ability to carry a firearm without a restriction in place by the Government. In a Constitutional Carry State, there is no licensing or training required to legally carry a firearm. Some states with unlicensed carry have implemented certain policies that restrict the method of carry or who can carry. Some require you to be 21, others require you to be a resident of that state, and others only allow concealed or open carry.
Isn’t it Dangerous?
It may seem somewhat odd that there is no government required training to carry a weapon, and I can understand why some will see this as dangerous. However, in the States that have adopted Constitutional carry, there hasn’t been an increase in violence or firearms accidents. Vermont is one of the safest states in the Union. There are a few reasons to this.
First off people are still seeking training to know how to use a firearm in Constitutional Carry states. There are more firearms training schools now than ever. I’m a certified instructor in my home state and I am a proponent for unrestricted carry. I know, even if it’s not required, people will still come to me for training. Serious concealed carriers with either seek training out or train themselves. Guns aren’t so complicated that a person couldn’t learn to carry successfully by themselves.
People who carry every day take responsibility for themselves and are likely responsible people. It takes real dedication to carry every single day. Those who don’t take their responsibility to defend themselves seriously are unlikely to carry a firearm, even infrequently.
Benefits of Constitutional Carry
Concealed carry laws have never stopped a criminal from carrying without a license. All it does is prevent law abiding citizens from carrying a firearm. Concealed carry licensing systems can easily prevent people from carrying a firearm to protect themselves. They also leave people vulnerable during the often long process applying and being approved.
The often high costs prevent lower income individuals from obtaining permits. In my state, it costs 112 dollars just for the license. There is also a required class which can cost anywhere from 50 to 150 dollars. The license requires someone to find at least two days to take the class and apply for the license. For some lower-income individuals and families, it would be nearly impossible to miss two days of work. When you take into account that lower income families are more likely to be the victims of a violent crime this is even more insane. The wait can then be up to 90 days while they process the application and mail out the card.
As Doctor King said, “A right delayed is a right denied.”
Constitutional carry makes it possible for hard-working, low-income individuals to protect themselves without undue burden.
Constitutional carry would also reduce government bureaucracy and trim government spending on licensing agencies.
More people would carry firearms, which often results in a lower violent crime rate. In the last decade concealed carry permits have tripled, and in that same time the murder rate has dipped to the lowest it’s been since 1993.
Constitutional carry takes the right to bear arms and returns it to the status of a right. If you need to be permitted to carry a gun it’s a privilege and not a right.
Successful Transitions
Over 20 states have adopted Constitutional Carry and none of them have had any increase in gun violence or a higher rate of accidents involving firearms. I imagine and hope Constitutional carry will spread like concealed carry did throughout the 1990s. Over time people will accept it as a right, and that a permit will not prevent crime. Hopefully, the Constitution will once again be the Supreme Law of the Land, and carrying a gun won’t require permission.
What do you think about Constitutional Carry? Let me know in the comments below!
I grew up in an open carry State and hardware stores sold firearms. I was very young when I was in a firearms class sponsored by the NRA. This was almost 60 years ago. Parsing words and “political “ correctness have deluded many into passing laws that infringe on our rights. Karl Marx knew that changing the conversation can change the perspective and this is what the Progressive movement is all about. The desire to an gums but not cars is an example of it. It’s the parents responsibility to educate and train their children and the NRA has many great programs for kids. We can’t force parental responsibility but neither should we allow our rights to be conflated into being viewed as a privilege. Based on my experience I am in favor of Constitutional Carry.
In my opinion if you look at all these countries that are trying to come to the United States because they’re being oppressed by their government they have one thing in common. These countries do not allow their citizens to legally possess carry use firearms because the government is afraid of the citizens. Our founding fathers new this when they put the Second Amendment in to the Bill of Rights. The Second Amendment is not a privilege it is not a right it is a responsibility of every man woman in these United States of America to possess and use a firearm to defend this great nation. Whether it be from hostile forces coming into this nation or the government of this nation. Tyranny is a real thing and the sooner the people realize that our government works for us we tell it what we want it does not tell us what we get. Never in my life have I ever heard my generation I’m 51 years old say you need to tell me how to be safe asking the government to tell me how to protect myself and my family. The new generations that are out there feel they need to ask permission they’ve been taught in school systems today the ideology of a coward Society. I am not a conspiracy theorist I am not anti government I simply state that stupid has went too far there are not nice people out there there is evil in this world and we need to protect ourselves from evil that is our responsibility God mandates that in the Bible. And I’m speaking from experience I have been around this world and I have seen the oppression of citizens and other countries the government oppresses this sooner this generation realizes it the sooner we could put this issue to bed.
I am all for Constitutional Carry and the and the 2nd Amendment. Having been born and lived in another country and immigrated legally to the United States, I can first hand attest to the importance of being able to defend ourselfves from non law abiding criminals and corrupt Government, this inturn provides the foundation for our well-being.
Waiting for reciprocity to carry from state to state nation wide.
I unequivocally defend and support the right of every human being to employ the tools necessary for the defense of himself and others. I do not like the term “constitutional carry” because it implies that the right to self-defense emanates from the USC. If it did, it could be amended out. But it does not. It is acknowledged in the USC; it exists in ‘natural’ law.