All about Constitutional Carry

All about Constitutional Carry

A huge trend that has swept through grassroots gun organizations is Constitutional carry. The gun community mobilized more than ever in 2012 after beating back a constant attack on our firearms rights. Coming out of the defense these organizations went on the offense. One of the offensive goals was the right to carry a firearm without having to ask permission, this is known as Constitutional carry.


Constitutional carry used to be known as Vermont carry. Vermont as a state never restricted the carry of firearms by any adult. It was ruled by the State Supreme court that the State’s constitution did not allow restrictions, including licensing schemes. Vermont had essentially been a Constitutional carry state since before the United State’s existed.


Defining Constitutional Carry

Constitutional Carry is by definition the ability to carry a firearm without a restriction in place by the Government. In a Constitutional Carry State, there is no licensing or training required to legally carry a firearm. Some states with unlicensed carry have implemented certain policies that restrict the method of carry or who can carry. Some require you to be 21, others require you to be a resident of that state, and others only allow concealed or open carry.


Isn’t it Dangerous?

It may seem somewhat odd that there is no government required training to carry a weapon, and I can understand why some will see this as dangerous. However, in the States that have adopted Constitutional carry, there hasn’t been an increase in violence or firearms accidents. Vermont is one of the safest states in the Union. There are a few reasons to this.


First off people are still seeking training to know how to use a firearm in Constitutional Carry states. There are more firearms training schools now than ever. I’m a certified instructor in my home state and I am a proponent for unrestricted carry. I know, even if it’s not required, people will still come to me for training. Serious concealed carriers with either seek training out or train themselves. Guns aren’t so complicated that a person couldn’t learn to carry successfully by themselves.


People who carry every day take responsibility for themselves and are likely responsible people. It takes real dedication to carry every single day. Those who don’t take their responsibility to defend themselves seriously are unlikely to carry a firearm, even infrequently.


Benefits of Constitutional Carry

Concealed carry laws have never stopped a criminal from carrying without a license. All it does is prevent law abiding citizens from carrying a firearm. Concealed carry licensing systems can easily prevent people from carrying a firearm to protect themselves. They also leave people vulnerable during the often long process applying and being approved.


The often high costs prevent lower income individuals from obtaining permits. In my state, it costs 112 dollars just for the license. There is also a required class which can cost anywhere from 50 to 150 dollars. The license requires someone to find at least two days to take the class and apply for the license. For some lower-income individuals and families, it would be nearly impossible to miss two days of work. When you take into account that lower income families are more likely to be the victims of a violent crime this is even more insane. The wait can then be up to 90 days while they process the application and mail out the card.


As Doctor King said, “A right delayed is a right denied.”


Constitutional carry makes it possible for hard-working, low-income individuals to protect themselves without undue burden.


Constitutional carry would also reduce government bureaucracy and trim government spending on licensing agencies.


More people would carry firearms, which often results in a lower violent crime rate. In the last decade concealed carry permits have tripled, and in that same time the murder rate has dipped to the lowest it’s been since 1993.


Constitutional carry takes the right to bear arms and returns it to the status of a right. If you need to be permitted to carry a gun it’s a privilege and not a right.  


Successful Transitions

Ten states have adopted Constitutional Carry and none of them have had any increase in gun violence or a higher rate of accidents involving firearms. I imagine and hope Constitutional carry will spread like concealed carry did throughout the 1990s. Over time people will accept it as a right, and that a permit will not prevent crime. Hopefully, the Constitution will once again be the Supreme Law of the Land, and carrying a gun won’t require permission.

What do you think about Constitutional Carry?  Let me know in the comments below!


134 comments

  • I would be all for it because the criminal doesn’t have no permit but the one who wants to follow the law has to get a permit which I am doing now.

    Robert Douglas
  • In over 60 years of firearm experience and the last 15 years as an NRA Firearms Instructors I have provided training in Ohio to numerous people who had already possessed more than enough firearms experience and training which I have no doubt would exercise the carrying of a firearm responsibly and safely. However, I also have provided training to some people that would absolutely scare me if they choose to carry a handgun without official training pending the passage of the current CC Bill 142 before the Ohio legislature now.

    While you point out that low income citizens are being penalized because of the cost to obtain a concealed carry permit, thereby making it a “privilege” instead of a “right” (and I agree wholeheartedly) that point can easily be turned by understanding these same people will not seek out firearms training for the same reason. You say, “However, in the States that have adopted Constitutional carry, there hasn’t been an increase in violence or firearms accidents”, I’d like to see factual statics to verify how many people living in the CC States have been arrested and lost their CC right to even bear arms concerning “deadly weapons” violations of the law, which are felonies in most States.

    Notwithstanding my status as an NRA Life Member & Firearms Instructor (from which I derived a portion of my income) I support the CC right to carry without the government intrusion of a mandatory license scheme but sure hope you are right about those who will do so and seek out some type of training for the good of the public safety, including mine & family. Only time will tell……………..

    Last note: The passage of the CC in Ohio looks very favorable in the House and Senate with Governor approval.

    Art Carney
  • I’ve owned handguns for over 20 years & have finally took the class for concealed& carry. The class was $106 & to file it with the sheriff’s office was $89. Very expensive especially when your only income is Social Security. There isn’t a reduction in costs what really set me back paying the added costs.

    Merle Jarvis
  • We have just adopted CC and I for one am stoked. I carry but u get the person that is terified that u got one on ur side. They make a big scene. But now starting July first I can carry without people reacting to it badly. I have trained my self and still continue to do so. I dont think a person should just slap a gun on them without training themselfs or going to someone to be trained

    Dean Taylor
  • Is North Carolina a constitutional carry state?

    Glenda Hubbard

Leave a comment