All about Constitutional Carry

All about Constitutional Carry

Did you know that your right to carry a firearm could be under threat? For years, the government has placed restrictions on your ability to protect yourself and your loved ones, forcing you to jump through hoops and pay hefty fees just to exercise your Second Amendment rights. But there's a growing movement that's challenging these restrictions and fighting to give you back your right to carry without government interference. It's called Constitutional Carry, and in this post, we'll explore everything you need to know about this powerful movement and its potential impact on the world of firearms.

 A huge trend that has swept through grassroots gun organizations is Constitutional carry. The gun community mobilized more than ever in 2012 after beating back a constant attack on our firearms rights. Coming out of that defense these organizations went on the offense. One of the offensive goals was the right to carry a firearm without having to ask permission, this is known as Constitutional carry.


Constitutional carry used to be known as Vermont carry. Vermont as a state never restricted the carry of firearms by any adult. It was ruled by the State Supreme court that the State’s constitution did not allow restrictions, including licensing schemes. Vermont had essentially been a Constitutional carry state since before the United State’s existed.


Defining Constitutional Carry

Constitutional Carry is by definition the ability to carry a firearm without a restriction in place by the Government. In a Constitutional Carry State, there is no licensing or training required to legally carry a firearm. Some states with unlicensed carry have implemented certain policies that restrict the method of carry or who can carry. Some require you to be 21, others require you to be a resident of that state, and others only allow concealed or open carry.


Isn’t it Dangerous?

It may seem somewhat odd that there is no government required training to carry a weapon, and I can understand why some will see this as dangerous. However, in the States that have adopted Constitutional carry, there hasn’t been an increase in violence or firearms accidents. Vermont is one of the safest states in the Union. There are a few reasons to this.


First off people are still seeking training to know how to use a firearm in Constitutional Carry states. There are more firearms training schools now than ever. I’m a certified instructor in my home state and I am a proponent for unrestricted carry. I know, even if it’s not required, people will still come to me for training. Serious concealed carriers with either seek training out or train themselves. Guns aren’t so complicated that a person couldn’t learn to carry successfully by themselves.


People who carry every day take responsibility for themselves and are likely responsible people. It takes real dedication to carry every single day. Those who don’t take their responsibility to defend themselves seriously are unlikely to carry a firearm, even infrequently.


Benefits of Constitutional Carry

Concealed carry laws have never stopped a criminal from carrying without a license. All it does is prevent law abiding citizens from carrying a firearm. Concealed carry licensing systems can easily prevent people from carrying a firearm to protect themselves. They also leave people vulnerable during the often long process applying and being approved.


The often high costs prevent lower income individuals from obtaining permits. In my state, it costs 112 dollars just for the license. There is also a required class which can cost anywhere from 50 to 150 dollars. The license requires someone to find at least two days to take the class and apply for the license. For some lower-income individuals and families, it would be nearly impossible to miss two days of work. When you take into account that lower income families are more likely to be the victims of a violent crime this is even more insane. The wait can then be up to 90 days while they process the application and mail out the card.


As Doctor King said, “A right delayed is a right denied.”


Constitutional carry makes it possible for hard-working, low-income individuals to protect themselves without undue burden.


Constitutional carry would also reduce government bureaucracy and trim government spending on licensing agencies.


More people would carry firearms, which often results in a lower violent crime rate. In the last decade concealed carry permits have tripled, and in that same time the murder rate has dipped to the lowest it’s been since 1993.


Constitutional carry takes the right to bear arms and returns it to the status of a right. If you need to be permitted to carry a gun it’s a privilege and not a right.  


Successful Transitions

Over 20 states have adopted Constitutional Carry and none of them have had any increase in gun violence or a higher rate of accidents involving firearms. I imagine and hope Constitutional carry will spread like concealed carry did throughout the 1990s. Over time people will accept it as a right, and that a permit will not prevent crime. Hopefully, the Constitution will once again be the Supreme Law of the Land, and carrying a gun won’t require permission.

What do you think about Constitutional Carry?  Let me know in the comments below!

Last New

162 comments

  • The absence of training for constitutional carry states is the deal breaker for me. I see too many careless cowboys at my shooting range to think otherwise. Some level of training and background check is necessary. After this, however, there should be nationwide reciprocity. I also like the suggestion someone made about making the training and license fees tax deductible.

    Charles Chambers
  • Let me preface my response by saying that I am a strong proponent of the 2A. However, I have mixed feelings about the Constitutional Carry. Allowing people, especially new handgun owners, to carry without some form of training seems risky for a few reasons.

    First, there’s the safety issue — people who have not handled pistols and revolvers before need to be schooled on the basics to avoid injury to self and others. Case in point, how many people do you know who have been victims of “slide bite” when shooting a semi-auto the first time? Not a lethal injury by any means, but most of us would agree it would be best to prevent the skin from being ripped off the thumb knuckle if possible! Of course, preventing careless mistakes from injuring or killing others warrants even greater concern.

    Second, I think there is a general lack of awareness of the potential legal, financial, and moral risks associated with shooting someone in self defense. Even in perceived “slam dunk” cases of a justifiable shooting, you will likely be detained by the police, and face greater scrutiny by the prosecutor (as well as the judge and jury if the case goes to trial). Furthermore, even if there are no criminal charges filed, there’s no way to predict the outcome of a potential civil lawsuit. We’ve all seen the crazy headlines. And don’t discount the “Court of Public Opinion.” No matter how right you are in shooting a bad guy, the gun issue is so divisive, it’s highly likely you will be ostracized by the news media, neighbors, and possibly even friends and family members.

    I do agree that our 2A rights SHOULD allow us to carry without a state- or federally-issued permit. However, I also know how dangerous ignorant people are to themselves and others. Couple this with the crazy, litigious environment we find ourselves in … and, well, hopefully you see my point. Mandatory education makes sense to me.

    Timothy Cooper
  • I think it is the only way to go!

    Lenus Moore
  • As a proud West Virginian who is now enjoying the benefits of the hard work of many individuals and lawmakers who worked tirelessly to get Constitutional Carry legislation passed in our State, I can say without reservation it should be law nationwide. Anti-gun people had tirelessly spewed out their rhetoric but in reality our State has not become the “Wild West Show” everyone feared. Life goes on as normal — the only possible change I’ve seen is “An armed Society is a Polite Society”. ….Maybe that’s a good thing!!!

    Ed Rollins Jr
  • I’m all for constitutional carry the way I see it the secondment amendment is our permit to carry

    Keith Jury

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published