All about Constitutional Carry

All about Constitutional Carry

A huge trend that has swept through grassroots gun organizations is Constitutional carry. The gun community mobilized more than ever in 2012 after beating back a constant attack on our firearms rights. Coming out of the defense these organizations went on the offense. One of the offensive goals was the right to carry a firearm without having to ask permission, this is known as Constitutional carry.


Constitutional carry used to be known as Vermont carry. Vermont as a state never restricted the carry of firearms by any adult. It was ruled by the State Supreme court that the State’s constitution did not allow restrictions, including licensing schemes. Vermont had essentially been a Constitutional carry state since before the United State’s existed.


Defining Constitutional Carry

Constitutional Carry is by definition the ability to carry a firearm without a restriction in place by the Government. In a Constitutional Carry State, there is no licensing or training required to legally carry a firearm. Some states with unlicensed carry have implemented certain policies that restrict the method of carry or who can carry. Some require you to be 21, others require you to be a resident of that state, and others only allow concealed or open carry.


Isn’t it Dangerous?

It may seem somewhat odd that there is no government required training to carry a weapon, and I can understand why some will see this as dangerous. However, in the States that have adopted Constitutional carry, there hasn’t been an increase in violence or firearms accidents. Vermont is one of the safest states in the Union. There are a few reasons to this.


First off people are still seeking training to know how to use a firearm in Constitutional Carry states. There are more firearms training schools now than ever. I’m a certified instructor in my home state and I am a proponent for unrestricted carry. I know, even if it’s not required, people will still come to me for training. Serious concealed carriers with either seek training out or train themselves. Guns aren’t so complicated that a person couldn’t learn to carry successfully by themselves.


People who carry every day take responsibility for themselves and are likely responsible people. It takes real dedication to carry every single day. Those who don’t take their responsibility to defend themselves seriously are unlikely to carry a firearm, even infrequently.


Benefits of Constitutional Carry

Concealed carry laws have never stopped a criminal from carrying without a license. All it does is prevent law abiding citizens from carrying a firearm. Concealed carry licensing systems can easily prevent people from carrying a firearm to protect themselves. They also leave people vulnerable during the often long process applying and being approved.


The often high costs prevent lower income individuals from obtaining permits. In my state, it costs 112 dollars just for the license. There is also a required class which can cost anywhere from 50 to 150 dollars. The license requires someone to find at least two days to take the class and apply for the license. For some lower-income individuals and families, it would be nearly impossible to miss two days of work. When you take into account that lower income families are more likely to be the victims of a violent crime this is even more insane. The wait can then be up to 90 days while they process the application and mail out the card.


As Doctor King said, “A right delayed is a right denied.”


Constitutional carry makes it possible for hard-working, low-income individuals to protect themselves without undue burden.


Constitutional carry would also reduce government bureaucracy and trim government spending on licensing agencies.


More people would carry firearms, which often results in a lower violent crime rate. In the last decade concealed carry permits have tripled, and in that same time the murder rate has dipped to the lowest it’s been since 1993.


Constitutional carry takes the right to bear arms and returns it to the status of a right. If you need to be permitted to carry a gun it’s a privilege and not a right.  


Successful Transitions

Ten states have adopted Constitutional Carry and none of them have had any increase in gun violence or a higher rate of accidents involving firearms. I imagine and hope Constitutional carry will spread like concealed carry did throughout the 1990s. Over time people will accept it as a right, and that a permit will not prevent crime. Hopefully, the Constitution will once again be the Supreme Law of the Land, and carrying a gun won’t require permission.

What do you think about Constitutional Carry?  Let me know in the comments below!


100 comments

  • The Constitution was hard fought for and should be the law of the land! There shouldn’t be taken lightly. Other articles of the Constitution are selectively followed with out question!! We as a country are given this Constitution article 2 to give us the right to bear arms for the purpose to protect the country and family!

    Mike Davis
  • Agree 100%. How on earth did we allow all these restrictions on arms to come into play? Why doesnt every gun owner in every state, that doesnt allow you to buy any weapon or carry it however you feel comfortable, file a lawsuit against their state for violation of civil rights? Our founding fathers knew that high explosives(gun powder kegs) and state of the art arms(muskets, rifles, cannons) were essential in securing our rights from tyrannical governments. For a right that clearly states that the government has NO POWER to infringe, impede, hinder or hic -cough our right to bear weapons that give us an equal chance to protect ourselves from ANY ARMY, we sure do have an awful amount of rules and regulations and denied access to modern armaments.

    Keith Schuster
  • I agree with Constitutional Carry 100%. My issue is firearms getting into the wrong hands (mentally ill, convicted felon, etc.)
    I realize that it makes no difference to those individuals about laws and restrictions. They’ll get firearms anyway. But I feel that a background check should be done to determine competency.
    As for me, I carry EVERY DAY. I’m NEVER without my firearm. It is my Constitutional RIGHT, and I exercise it. There should be a minimal cost for the background check and that should be it. No permit needed.

    Stephanie Martin
  • Wow….I think, since I ETS from the Army and since about 4 months ago when I decided to get into conceal carry, I have not read anything as perfect as this article. Being in the Army and spending half my time enclosed in 4 walls dealing with weapons got me tired or disinterested in them. But sometimes we ignore our rights. Having the right should not be left to people checking your background to say yey or ney. I am with you in all of this. People who decide to carry are extremely more responsible than people may think. None of these legalisms will stop criminals from being criminals. It is sad that rights like these are left in the hands of politics that in turn just play at having the upper hand to wind, stepping on your rights (most of the time) or giving you sort of permission to have rights……Job well done. Article excellent.

    Juan L. Cruz
  • I agree with the spirit of Constitutional Carry. I live in RI, and we have a very long and difficult process here to obtain the right to carry a handgun. There are two methods by which one can become legally eligible to carry a firearm. One is through the state, and the other is through the police chief in the city or town of your residence. Both methods are a long and very difficult process. I am a business owner, and it took me 9 full months and lots of paperwork, time away from work, and training to get to the point where I am now. I spent about $600.00 of my money and lots of man hours running around to get the paperwork and the required tasks completed. You are correct to quote MLK, “A right delayed is a right denied.” I can think of many times where I wondered if it was actually worth it to continue. Since RI is a left wing state and there are many voices calling for the abolishment of the 2nd Amendment here, then you can see that it is no accident that it is so difficult to obtain a license here. There are many in my Sportsmen’s club that would love to carry, but do not have the money, the time, or the perseverance to go through this arduous process. Leftism is a top down hellish form of government that hates our constitution and takes away our freedom one nuisance law at a time. If I didn’t have a business here, then I would move to a state that is friendlier to my political beliefs.

    Kent Ormondroyd

Leave a comment