All about Constitutional Carry

All about Constitutional Carry

A huge trend that has swept through grassroots gun organizations is Constitutional carry. The gun community mobilized more than ever in 2012 after beating back a constant attack on our firearms rights. Coming out of the defense these organizations went on the offense. One of the offensive goals was the right to carry a firearm without having to ask permission, this is known as Constitutional carry.


Constitutional carry used to be known as Vermont carry. Vermont as a state never restricted the carry of firearms by any adult. It was ruled by the State Supreme court that the State’s constitution did not allow restrictions, including licensing schemes. Vermont had essentially been a Constitutional carry state since before the United State’s existed.


Defining Constitutional Carry

Constitutional Carry is by definition the ability to carry a firearm without a restriction in place by the Government. In a Constitutional Carry State, there is no licensing or training required to legally carry a firearm. Some states with unlicensed carry have implemented certain policies that restrict the method of carry or who can carry. Some require you to be 21, others require you to be a resident of that state, and others only allow concealed or open carry.


Isn’t it Dangerous?

It may seem somewhat odd that there is no government required training to carry a weapon, and I can understand why some will see this as dangerous. However, in the States that have adopted Constitutional carry, there hasn’t been an increase in violence or firearms accidents. Vermont is one of the safest states in the Union. There are a few reasons to this.


First off people are still seeking training to know how to use a firearm in Constitutional Carry states. There are more firearms training schools now than ever. I’m a certified instructor in my home state and I am a proponent for unrestricted carry. I know, even if it’s not required, people will still come to me for training. Serious concealed carriers with either seek training out or train themselves. Guns aren’t so complicated that a person couldn’t learn to carry successfully by themselves.


People who carry every day take responsibility for themselves and are likely responsible people. It takes real dedication to carry every single day. Those who don’t take their responsibility to defend themselves seriously are unlikely to carry a firearm, even infrequently.


Benefits of Constitutional Carry

Concealed carry laws have never stopped a criminal from carrying without a license. All it does is prevent law abiding citizens from carrying a firearm. Concealed carry licensing systems can easily prevent people from carrying a firearm to protect themselves. They also leave people vulnerable during the often long process applying and being approved.


The often high costs prevent lower income individuals from obtaining permits. In my state, it costs 112 dollars just for the license. There is also a required class which can cost anywhere from 50 to 150 dollars. The license requires someone to find at least two days to take the class and apply for the license. For some lower-income individuals and families, it would be nearly impossible to miss two days of work. When you take into account that lower income families are more likely to be the victims of a violent crime this is even more insane. The wait can then be up to 90 days while they process the application and mail out the card.


As Doctor King said, “A right delayed is a right denied.”


Constitutional carry makes it possible for hard-working, low-income individuals to protect themselves without undue burden.


Constitutional carry would also reduce government bureaucracy and trim government spending on licensing agencies.


More people would carry firearms, which often results in a lower violent crime rate. In the last decade concealed carry permits have tripled, and in that same time the murder rate has dipped to the lowest it’s been since 1993.


Constitutional carry takes the right to bear arms and returns it to the status of a right. If you need to be permitted to carry a gun it’s a privilege and not a right.  


Successful Transitions

Ten states have adopted Constitutional Carry and none of them have had any increase in gun violence or a higher rate of accidents involving firearms. I imagine and hope Constitutional carry will spread like concealed carry did throughout the 1990s. Over time people will accept it as a right, and that a permit will not prevent crime. Hopefully, the Constitution will once again be the Supreme Law of the Land, and carrying a gun won’t require permission.

What do you think about Constitutional Carry?  Let me know in the comments below!


84 comments

  • I personally agree with the constitutional carry, simply because it’s every Americans right to keep and bear arms. By not allowing an American that right is just proof that the government is slowly taking our rights away from us.

    Shawn T.
  • I think in States like Texas where I live, our rights are violated. The Constitution does not say thou shalt have a piece of paper to carry a firearm. I have been shooting since I was 6 years old when my Dad handed me a 12 gauge and taught me how to hunt. I don’t know of anyone that would go purchase a fire arm and go around shooting except those who intend to break the law in the first place. To my State and all States that require a piece of paper, tell the truth, its not about the gun. Its about the extra tax income. Remember, an armed society is a polite society.

    Fred Sherman
  • I think it’s a good idea. But whoever will carry should get professional instruction. Just don’t go out and buy a gun then start shooting without knowing how to handle the weapon. I think people that don’t carry have an attitude of it’s not going to happen to me. Until something happens. I live in Chicago and it’s absolutely horrifying what’s out there every week and weekend.

    Nicholas Laramie
  • Further to my earlier comment of this morning, I wonder how many CC states of those 10 have had a mass shooting at schools, churches, markets etc?

    Alan Carnell
  • The whole issue of CC is a can of worms. In one way I agree with the training requirement, but then again how many avoidable auto accidents are there by "trained " licensed drivers?

    While living CA, I became seriously handicapped and wheelchair bound. Our business was in a dangerous part of Stockton CA & the licensing laws would not allow issue of a permit for at least 12 months (if I was lucky according to a sheriff deputy). So I go unprotected, no way can I retreat safely.

    I moved to TN, a shall issue state, and got my permit after near 90 days. Three months being unable to defend myself.

    Now I live in AZ, a CC state. Here I have never seen any open carry, at the range I see very responsible individuals enjoying their rights.

    In essence, I’m all for CC, however, I do feel training is a necessity but having said that, training is not a guarantee that the individual will not act irresponsibly. I refer back to the auto licensing comment.

    My only offer of a solution is extremely harsh penalties for misuse and serious enforcement of those laws. Judges in this day and age seem to favor the perpetrators and not the victims. That has to be reigned in.

    Alan

    Alan Carnell

Leave a comment